₁միայն ₂ծարաւի՛ ₃լեր ₄սիրոյն, ₅եւ ₆անդէն ₇աղբիւր ₈կենդանութեան ₉զերաշտութիւն ₁₀ծարաւոյն ₁₁պասքելոյն ₁₂յագեցուսցէ ₁₃զքեզ.

本文状態: Phase 2 frozen target v1.0.1。working sentence ID AGATH.§11.S06。

OPEN: 「ただ愛に渇く者となれ。そうすればすぐに、生命の泉が……あなたを満たすであろう。」後半 9–13 の項構造を未確定のまま保持する。

ローマナイズ

• ծարաւի (CALFA Ծարաւի, ւոյ, աւեաց) = thirsty, dry; figuratively “thirsting/panting for, ardent, eager”。
• լեր = լինիմ affirmative imperative 2SG。「～であれ／～となれ」。
• աղբիւր կենդանութեան = 「生命の泉」。CALFA Աղբիւր に exact example Կենդանի է, եւ աղբիւր կենդանութեան。
• երաշտութիւն = dryness, aridity。CALFA に Եթէ ոք պասքեալ իցէ … քանզի զերաշտութիւն լուծանէ という պասքեալ との近接例。
• պասքիմ, եցայ = be very thirsty; pant/eagerly long for。
• յագեցուցանեմ, ուցի = satisfy, satiate, sate。通常は満たされる人・魂・腹・感情などを ACC に取る。
• Bible concordance でも յագեցուցանել զդոսա հացիւ, զանձինս … յագեցուսցես, յագեցուցանէ զանձն, յագեցուցանէ զորովայն 等、patient ACC + content/instrument の構造が確認できる。

պասքելոյն を屈折不定詞の GEN と即断しない。

KB ABE1936 NOM §98 は過去分詞の曲用を明示する：

առաքեալ → առաքելոյ → առաքելով
առաքեալք → առաքելոց → առաքելովք

したがって պասքեալ → պասքելոյն は正規の past participle GEN/DAT.SG.DEF として成立する。

さらに KOS1980 Ch.3 p.107 の causative discussion に exact comparator:

Թէ պասքելոյս արբուցանիցես, աղբիւր ես
「もし渇いている私に飲ませるなら、あなたは泉である」

があり、պասքելոյս が nominalized past participle の oblique form として人物を指しうることを直接支持する。

したがって S006 の 11 は第一候補として nominalized / substantival past participle「渇ききった者の／者に」とする。不定詞 GEN/DAT は surface-homographic alternative として残す。

REVIEW.001 — ծարաւի՛ լեր սիրոյն ծարաւի + copular imperative լեր の predicate-adjective construction を第一候補とする。4 սիրոյն が ծարաւի の complement GEN/DAT「愛を渇望する」として説明できるかを KB/lexical comparanda で確定する。

REVIEW.002 — 9–13 argument structure surface:

աղբիւր կենդանութեան
զերաշտութիւն
ծարաւոյն պասքելոյն
յագեցուսցէ
զքեզ

には二つの z-marked accusative (9, 13) が見える。単純な two-direct-object analysis は採らない。

Relevant KB:

• ABE1936.SYN06.C002 (§§172–173): ACC は direct object 以外に adverbial / cognate / qualitative accusative として用いられる。
• ABE §173 は、動詞語幹と同根・同義・密接関連の nominal ACC が qualitative complement となり、現代語では instrumental 相当に訳される場合を記述する。
• SYN.05: genuine/predicative double accusative は限定された construction class であり、surface ACC+ACC だけから認定しない。
• KOS1980.SYN05.C001: causatives は argument structure が可変で、ACC direct object + DAT mediator、mediator omission、単一 ACC が複数役割を担う型などを持つ。

Working hypotheses:

• A: 13 զքեզ = ordinary patient/direct object; 9–11 = qualitative/content/respect ACC phrase (“渇ききった者の渇きの乾きという点で”)。
• B: 9 զերաշտութիւն = direct object; 13 զքեզ = resumptive/appositional person reference after 10–11。
• C: true double accusative under causative semantics。
• D: rhetorical/zeugmatic coordination of two ACC objects without overt coordinator。

A is currently structurally strongest because յագեցուցանեմ independently and repeatedly selects the satiated person/entity as ACC, while true double-ACC is not licensed merely by causative morphology. Not yet adjudicated.

ծարաւի՛ լեր սիրոյն は predicate adjective + copular imperative として確定度が高い。

• CALFA Ծարաւի は literal “thirsty” に加えて figurative “thirsting/panting for, ardent, eager”。
• 同 entry に ծարաւի արեան「血に渇く」、ծարաւի են մահուան「死を渇望する」の GEN complement comparanda がある。
• よって սիրոյն GEN.SG.DEF は ծարաւի の対象 complement として自然。
• լեր は 2SG imperative of լինիմ。「～であれ／～となれ」。

Adopted:

միայն
└─ ծարաւի՛ լեր
   └─ սիրոյն
      「ただ愛に渇く者となれ／ただ愛を渇望せよ」

REVIEW.001: RESOLVED.

CALFA lemma: Յագեցուցանեմ, ուցի “satisfy, satiate, sate”。

HMB2018 §§139–143:

• causatives use -ոյց / unstressed -ուց;
• causatives derived from neutral verbs acquire active/transitive semantics;
• perfect-stem forms use the causative perfect stem;
• before future/subjunctive ց, stem-final ց has the regular ս alternation already documented in the verbal system.

Thus յագեցուսցէ = FUT2.SBJV.ACT.3SG is the working/adopted morphology.

Subject: NOM.SG աղբիւր կենդանութեան「生命の泉」。

KB SYN.05 explicitly warns against treating every ACC+ACC surface sequence as homogeneous double direct objects.

Relevant:

• BAG1852.SYN05.C001: some verbs take two accusatives, but their roles are heterogeneous.
• ABE1936.SYN05.C001–C002: predicative second ACC and person+theme double ACC are construction-specific.
• JEN1959.SYN05.C001: even with ուսուցանել, Jensen rejects a true homogeneous double-ACC analysis.
• KOS1980.SYN05.C001: causatives normally distinguish direct object and mediator; surface case patterns vary and can collapse roles.
• ABE1936.SYN06.C002: ACC also has adverbial / qualitative / cognate uses beyond direct object.

KOS1980 p.107 supplies especially relevant thirst-causative comparanda:

Արբուցանէ զոգւով ծարաւիս
「霊に渇く者たちに飲ませる」
Թէ պասքելոյս արբուցանիցես, աղբիւր ես
「もし渇いている私に飲ませるなら、あなたは泉である」

The latter independently confirms nominalized past participle պասքելոյս in an oblique person role.

For S006, ordinary lexical valency of յագեցուցանեմ strongly favors 13 զքեզ as the satiated patient:

• յագեցուցանել զդոսա հացիւ
• զանձինս կարօտեալս յագեցուսցես
• յագեցուցանէ զանձն իւր
• յագեցուցանէ զորովայն իւր

Therefore 9 զերաշտութիւն should not be promoted to a second homogeneous direct object without further evidence.

Current ranking:

1. A (preferred): զքեզ = patient DO; զերաշտութիւն … = noncanonical qualitative/content/respect ACC phrase specifying the thirst/dryness in which satiation operates.
2. B: զերաշտութիւն … = DO and զքեզ = resumptive/appositional person reference.
3. C: true causative double ACC.
4. D: zeugmatic two-object sequence.

A has the best independent valency support, but the exact internal relation of 9–11 remains OPEN.

ABE1936 §98 directly shows past participle declension:

առաքեալ → առաքելոյ → առաքելով

Therefore պասքեալ → պասքելոյն is a regular past participle GEN/DAT.SG.DEF.

This is strengthened by KOS1980's exact պասքելոյս comparator above.

Thus:

• PTCP oblique = first analysis.
• inflected infinitive GEN/DAT = formal homograph, retained as alternative but currently disfavored.

The remaining question is whether 10–11 form:

• ծարաւոյն պասքելոյն = an agreeing GEN phrase (“of the parched/thirsting one”), or
• a tighter rhetorical nominal phrase (“of parching thirst”).

This is now the principal unresolved subissue inside REVIEW.002.

STATUS: OPEN / REVIEW.001 RESOLVED; REVIEW.002 NARROWED TO 9–11 INTERNAL SYNTAX.

KOS1980 (chunk 000111) contains:

... կամեցայք ի սահանական ջրոց զփափագ ծարաւոյն յագեցուցանել

Here զփափագ ծարաւոյն “the longing/desire of thirst” is directly governed by յագեցուցանել. Therefore յագեցուցանել can take an abstract thirst/desire noun as its direct object. Earlier working inference that only a person/entity could be the direct object is RETRACTED.

CALFA likewise has յագեցուցանէ զցասումն “satisfy/vent wrath”, independently showing an abstract state/emotion as object.

BAG1852.NFIN07.C001 (§§1251,1254) explicitly states that oblique past-participle forms may function adjectivally.

Thus:

ծարաւոյն պասքելոյն
GEN.SG.DEF GEN.SG.DEF
NOUN        PTCP used adjectivally

can be parsed as noun + postposed agreeing adjectival past participle: “of the parched / burning thirst”.

This is preferable to forcing 11 to be a substantival “of the parched person”. The latter remains morphologically possible, but would create an additional unexpressed/coreferential person relation with final զքեզ without independent syntactic motivation.

Working NP:

զերաշտութիւն
└─ ծարաւոյն պասքելոյն
   「渇ききった渇きの乾き／焼けつく渇きの乾き」

The semantic redundancy is treated as rhetorical intensification, not as evidence against the syntax.

CALFA identifies յագեցուցանեմ as “to cause to be sated / տալ յագենալ”; its base յագենամ is neutral/intransitive “be satiated”.

This matters because:

• KOS1980's mediator DAT (sometimes ACC) rule applies specifically to causatives derived from transitive bases (արբուցանել, զգեցուցանել, ուսուցանել etc.).
• HAY2005 pp.52–53 explicitly distinguishes neutral-base causatives: they normally have no separately expressed mediator; the direct object itself bears the added affected/caused-participant role.
• Therefore importing the theme ACC + person mediator ACC analysis from ուսուցանել/արբուցանել into յագեցուցանել is not justified.

Accordingly, 13 զքեզ has the strongest claim to be the ordinary caused-patient/direct object: “cause you to be sated / satisfy you”.

With 13 as patient DO, 9 cannot simultaneously be treated as a second homogeneous DO merely because it is accusative.

ABE1936 §173 provides the closest grammatical category: an additional qualitative/cognate accusative may be formed from a noun semantically close to the governing verb and corresponds in translation to an instrumental / manner-content expression.

երաշտութիւն / ծարաւ and յագեցուցանել are not cognate, but belong to the same tightly opposed lexical event-frame “thirst/dryness ↔ satiation/slaking”. Moreover KOS1980 proves that a thirst-abstract can independently be the object of յագեցուցանել. This makes a content/respect ACC analysis plausible in the overloaded S006 construction:

աղբիւր կենդանութեան                  SUBJECT
├─ զերաշտութիւն ծարաւոյն պասքելոյն   CONTENT / RESPECT ACC
│  「焼けつく渇きの乾きについて／その乾きを」
└─ յագեցուսցէ զքեզ                    PREDICATE + PATIENT DO
   「あなたを満たすであろう」

Semantic unpacking: “the fountain of life will satisfy you in respect of / as to the dryness of your parching thirst.”

This preserves both independently attested valencies:

• յագեցուցանել + person ACC = satiate a person;
• յագեցուցանել + thirst/abstract ACC = satisfy/slake an abstract thirst;

while avoiding an unsupported homogeneous double-object rule.

• ALT-B: zeugmatic double patient — one verb simultaneously governs “slake the dryness/thirst” and “satiate you”. Semantically very natural, but no dedicated KB construction rule has yet been found. Retain as rhetorical-syntax alternative.
• ALT-C: 9 = sole DO; 13 = mediator/beneficiary ACC — weakened substantially because the KOS mediator rule is for transitive-base causatives, whereas յագեցուցանել derives from neutral յագենալ.
• ALT-D: 11 substantival PTCP “of the parched one” — morphologically possible, but creates redundant person reference alongside զքեզ; adjectival agreement with ծարաւոյն is structurally simpler.

REVIEW.002: provisionally RESOLVED in favor of patient DO զքեզ + content/respect ACC զերաշտութիւն ծարաւոյն պասքելոյն.

Before sentence close, de-anchored Recall must specifically attempt to overturn this noncanonical ACC analysis.

Precision checkpoint 3 の採用案を外し、9–13 を再評価した。

No, not strongly enough.

HMB2018 §180 states that ACC may additionally mark complements “formed from the same root as the verb or semantically close to it”, illustrated by:

Կոծեսցին ... կոծ
աշխարեսցեն աշխար

This securely licenses cognate / near-synonymous accusatives. But երաշտութիւն “dryness” and յագեցուցանել “satiate/slake” are not cognate or synonymous; they belong to an opposed event-frame.

Therefore the previous label CONTENT / RESPECT ACC is too strong if presented as a directly KB-licensed category. It is downgraded from adopted syntactic category to an interpretive paraphrase only.

Yes.

Abstract-object comparator:

զփափագ ծարաւոյն յագեցուցանել
“to satisfy the longing of thirst”

(KOS1980)

CALFA additionally:

յագեցուցանէ զցասումն
“satisfy / vent the wrath”

Person/entity-object comparators:

յագեցուցանել զդոսա հացիւ
յագեցոյց զանձինս քաղցեալս
յագեցուցանէ զանձն իւր
յագեցուցանէ զորովայն իւր

Thus both:

• յագեցուսցէ զերաշտութիւն … = “slake/satisfy the dryness/thirst …”
• յագեցուսցէ զքեզ = “satisfy/satiate you”

are independently normal semantic frames.

No.

յագեցուցանեմ is causative to neutral/intransitive յագենամ / յագիմ “be satiated”. KOS/HAY rules for an added mediator argument are principally relevant to causatives of transitive bases. No evidence requires treating either 9 or 13 as a causative mediator here.

No.

ABE1936 §98 proves PTCP oblique morphology; BAG1852.NFIN07.C001 proves oblique past participles can function adjectivally. Hence:

ծարաւոյն պասքելոյն
N.GEN.SG.DEF + PTCP.GEN.SG.DEF

is minimally parsed as an agreeing NP, “of the parched/burning thirst”. A substantival PTCP “of the thirsty one” remains formally possible but introduces an unnecessary person referent beside overt զքեզ.

The strongest evidence-based description is shared-predicate zeugma / rhetorical double government, not a special content/respect accusative:

աղբիւր կենդանութեան                         SUBJECT
            │
            ├── զերաշտութիւն ծարաւոյն պասքելոյն
            │      ↘
            │       յագեցուսցէ
            │      ↗
            └── զքեզ

The same finite verb is semantically instantiated in two compatible frames:

1. **''յագեցուսցէ զերաշտութիւն ...''** — “will slake/satisfy the dryness of the burning thirst”
2. **''յագեցուսցէ զքեզ''** — “will satisfy/satiate you”

The two frames converge referentially: slaking the addressee's thirst is satiating the addressee. This explains why both ACC phrases are retained without inventing a homogeneous two-object valency or extending the cognate-ACC rule beyond its evidence.

REVIEW.002: REVISED and RESOLVED.

• RETRACT as primary label: content/respect ACC.
• ADOPT: rhetorical shared-predicate / zeugmatic double government.
• Retain: 9–11 as an ordinary object frame of յագեցուցանել and 13 as a second ordinary object frame sharing the same overt verb.
• Residual: whether a historical grammar would assign a more specific traditional label to this exact rhetorical configuration is NON-BLOCKING / KB-NOT-DIRECTLY-ATTESTED.

9–12:

աղբիւր կենդանութեան զերաշտութիւն ծարաւոյն պասքելոյն յագեցուսցէ

だけでも、KOS1980 の զփափագ ծարաւոյն յագեցուցանել 型に照らして「生命の泉が焼けつく渇きの乾きを満たす／鎮める」という文法的・語彙的フレームは成立する。

その完成点の後に、文末で զքեզ「あなたを」 が置かれる。

この配置により、同じ一個の յագեցուսցէ が遡及的に第二の正常なフレーム յագեցուսցէ զքեզ「あなたを満たす」 を開く。したがって修辞効果としては、

「渇きを満たす」
       ↓
「――あなたを満たす」

という焦点移動が生じる。

これは「զքեզ が統語的に無意味／余剰」という意味ではない。զքեզ 自体は յագեցուցանել の正規の ACC object である。重要なのは、9–12 ですでに成立する第一フレームに対し、文末 13 が第二フレームを追加し、比喩の対象を最終的に聞き手本人へ収束させる点である。

S003–S005 が耳・頭・口蓋など聞き手の身体／感覚を順次扱った後、S006 は「愛への渇き → 生命の泉 → 渇きの充足」という比喩を展開し、最後の զքեզ で聞き手本人を明示的に焦点化する。これは文法的 claim ではなく、本文配置に基づく修辞的観察として保持する。

All major alternatives were re-opened:

• 11 inflected infinitive vs adjectival PTCP → PTCP favored by agreement and comparator.
• 11 substantival “thirsty one” → possible but structurally costlier.
• 9 special qualitative/cognate ACC → insufficiently directly licensed; withdrawn.
• 9+13 causative theme+mediator double ACC → unsupported for neutral-base causative.
• 9 sole DO + 13 resumptive/appositional → lacks independent evidence.
• shared-predicate zeugma → directly preserves both independently attested valency frames and rhetorical semantics.

DE-ANCHORED RECALL: PASS, WITH REVISION OF REVIEW.002.

STATUS: OPEN / DE-ANCHORED RECALL PASS — REVIEW.002 REVISED; CORE-DOMAIN COMPLETION NEXT.